ABSTRACT
Background: The occurrence of metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenic patients has been increased with the rampant use of second-generation antipsychotics. The aim and objective of this study is to compare the metabolic derangements induced by a typical antipsychotic: haloperidol and an atypical antipsychotic, risperidone in patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: Out of 60 newly diagnosed schizophrenic patients, 30 patients received tablet haloperidol and the remaining 30 patients received tablet risperidone orally. The anthropometric measurements like height, weight, waist circumference was measured and blood investigations like fasting blood glucose level and fasting lipid profile were taken at baseline and at the end of 3 and 6 months of drug therapy. The metabolic derangements induced by the two antipsychotics were compared and analyzed at end of 3rd and 6th month using SPSS software version 16.Results: At the end of 6th month statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in weight, waist circumference, fasting blood sugar, fasting triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein level between the haloperidol and risperidone group on following the International Diabetic Federation (IDF) criteria of metabolic syndrome. Risperidone caused metabolic abnormalities in 13.3%, 4 patients whereas none of the patients in haloperidol group developed metabolic syndrome.Conclusions: Hence it is concluded that the atypical antipsychotic risperidone has been associated with an increased risk of causing metabolic abnormalities than the typical antipsychotic haloperidol. Regular and periodic monitoring of the anthropometric and metabolic parameters in schizophrenic patients on antipsychotics especially the atypical antipsychotics is mandatory to prevent further complications.
ABSTRACT
Background: Anaemia is a cause of serious concern and contributes to a significantly higher maternal mortality. Rate Pressure Product (RPP) is a major determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption and blood flow. There is an increase in oxygen demand in anemia. Thus, in the present study, we have compared the difference in RPP between a normal pregnant women and pregnant women with anemia.Methods: A total of 180 pregnant women (normal pregnant woman - 90 and pregnant woman with anaemia - 90) belonging to different trimesters of pregnancy were included in the study. Age, height, and weight were recorded, and their body mass index was calculated. The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate was recorded and RPP was calculated.Results: There was a significant increase in RPP in pregnant woman with anaemia in all three trimesters of pregnancy, but the significant increase was more in the third trimester.Conclusions: The present study shows that there is an increase in RPP in pregnant woman with anaemia and they are more prone to hemodynamic stress and cardiovascular risks, especially in their third trimester of pregnancy. This hemodynamic change may be taken into account to prevent the cardiovascular complications associated with anemia in pregnancy. Thus, RPP can be used as a sensitive non-invasive simple marker for early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in pregnant woman.